To buy Litecoin is a must. Here’s explained why6 minuti

Download PDF
(English translation of Italian article dating 5 May 2017)

Miners approved Segwit on Litecoin. Will this make Litecoin the most technologically advanced currency on the market?

Yes. All the other cryptocurrencies, included Bitcoin, can’t scale. Without scaling, the more transactions are made in the world, the higher is the waiting time and cost for each transaction (commissions payed to miners)

Exactly, which benefits does scalability imply?

Thanks to scalability, Litecoin is now the only one cryptocurrency which is suit to substitute fiat money like Euro or Dollar for millions of users. The other cryptocurrencies, at the current technological stadium, can only work well as a store of value or mere assets for speculation, with a common destiny: due to the scalability issue, major is their success and diffusion, the less they can be used as a medium-of-exchange for common trades. Since no money is good money if it’s not a good medium-of-exchange, to invest in assets that can’t be what they promise to be might not be a good idea.

Is Bitcoin an exception?

Bitcoin can’t scale now, so it’s not an exception, but the technology to make it scalable is already existent (the same of Litecoin), it shall only be approved by miners. Bitcoin has a great advantage compared to the other cryptocurrencies in terms of number of users, capitalization, network of developers, wallets, businesses, payment processors, debit cards etc. For this reason, if the upgrade to Segwit was approved, Bitcoin would be back at the top of the most advanced technologies, and thanks to the network effect, it would smash whatever competitor, included Litecoin.

Then, is it better Bitcoin or Litecoin?

If only network effect counts, it’s not explained the success of Facebook after MySpace, or Google after Yahoo. If obstructionist miners decided to approve the upgrade on Bitcoin, making it finally scalable, Litecoin would be destined to remain in its shadow, and in the end maybe disappear. In that case, you would be better to exchange Litecoin back for Bitcoin. However, if the upgrade was too late, Bitcoin might lose the network effect advantage. In that case you might be that lucky guy who bought Litecoin when it still was worth nothing compared to its potentiality.

Why not to invest in Ethereum?

I retain improper to call Ethereum a cryptocurrency. A scientific interest for Ethereum is legit and then for the Ether too (the fuel for the engine of Ethereum decentralized contracts). But under an economic perspective, Ether is nothing than a mere speculative asset. It’s not money and doesn’t pretend it to be. Since there is no effective industrial or social application of success using Ethereum, if you are considering investing money, do it only if fully aware of the risks. Invest in Ethereum token only if you deeply know the technology and strongly believe that really successful application will be developed sooner or later. In some way, to invest in Ether is like investing in the shares of a startup with good marketing generating great hype. You should buy if you are technically competent and really believe in the startup proposed technology. You should also buy if you are a trader experienced in speculating on bubbles. Unless you belong to these two categories, stay away. Personally, I think that Bitcoin and Litecoin protocol with Segwit and Lightning Network is more promising for smart contracts rather than Ethereum itself. Therefore I won’t buy Ether.

Besides Segwit, what is the difference between Bitcoin and Litecoin?

Bitcoins are 21 millions, while litecoins 80 millions, but this does not matter much. The significant difference is that Bitcoin blocks are created every 10 minutes, while Litecoin blocks every 2.5 minutes. This implies an advantage and two disadvantages for Litecoin. The advantage is the shorter confirmation time for onchain transactions, which makes Litecoin four time faster than Bitcoin (today all transactions are onchain, but I’m taking for granted that after Lightning Network they will be mostly offchain). The first disadvantage is that Litecoin blockchain, if fully loaded (1mb per block, then 4mb every 10 minutes), will grow faster than Bitcoin blockchain (1mb every 10 minutes) and that makes the installation of a fullnode more costly, undermining the decentralization of the peer-to-peer network. The second disadvantage is that having blocks every 2,5 minutes instead of 10 minutes will make more likely to have two blocks found almost simultaneously by different miners. When it happens, one of the two is left as orphan, and it’s often the one of the smaller mining pool (because smaller pools spread the information about the new block slower than bigger ones, whose blocks are immediately recognized by the other miners as the new starting point in the chain for their calculations). Then those mining pools which put together more hashing power will be slightly advantaged. In the end, Bitcoin is slower, but slightly safer, since more decentralized (at least under a theoretical perspective). Since thanks to Segwit + LN the onchain speed is less important, being offchain transaction instantaneous, for equal upgrade Bitcoin is better than Litecoin.

What’s Segwit?

Segwit allows technologies like Lightning Network, making transactions instantaneous, anonymous and cheaper. In this article of the blog I briefly mention how LN works (only Italian), while here there are all technical details (both in English and Italian).

Will Litecoin price keep growing?

Litecoin has grown 500% in the last two months and will keep growing at least until Segwit will be approved on Bitcoin. Many developers of wallet and payment processors, also Core developers, will move to Litecoin to test the functioning of Lightning Network, with the hope of bringing as soon as possible the innovation to Bitcoin. Therefore we may expect some hype. It’s not late to enter the market. Until Litecoin remains the only one scalable cryptocurrency, it’s the only one that can survive in the long run. There is only one thing we need to look at: news about Bitcoin upgrades including Segwit.

How can I spend litecoins once purchased?

Litecoin users are much less than Bitcoin users, then very few sellers in the world accept Litecoin directly. You can use Coinsbank card, which can be prepaid with both Bitcoin and Litecoin. Payment works on VISA service, so you can use it wherever as any other debit card. Withdrawals from ATM are quite expensive. If you know other Litecoin debit cards please comment below. In general, due to exchange rates applied by cryptocurrency debit card providers, for common payments it is probably better to convert Litecoin back to fiat money directly from the exchange and make a wire transfer to the bank account. Unfortunately, Bitcoin remains useful only for high value purchases, especially when moving capitals abroad to avoid bank commissions and spread on the exchange rate. I’m not sure if it’s just my case, but not even my favorite online e-commerce for Bitcoin, which is, seems to work very well now that transaction commissions are so high: I am still waiting an order from Amazon with only 15% discount since almost 3 weeks, while I was used to buy stuff from Amazon with 19% discount and see the confirmation in no more than 2 days.

Last time I read an article from your blog, you stated that Bitcoin is not only a cryptocurrency, but a battle for a social, political and moral revolution. A switch to Litecoin couldn’t be interpreted as an act of betrayal against this ultimate purpose?

Without Segwit, Bitcoin can’t scale and can’t reach those numbers required to make it that instrument of social liberation we all hope it to be. To step into Litecoin is the best move we can do to support Bitcoin, because it’s a way to make the obstructionist miners understand they need to accept Segwit upgrade, showing them how good it’s for the currency and all the environment. Moreover, in the long run Litecoin success could undermine the supremacy of Bitcoin, and under the threat of competition miners could be forced to upgrade.

Share this page:

Potrebbero interessarti anche...

5 risposte

  1. tbar ha detto:

    do you still believe this to be the truth?

    • Alberto De Luigi ha detto:

      Nope. SegWit is going to be activated on Bitcoin and btc fees are likely to decrease. So litecoin is not the best anymore, just becomes a test-coin to try some new tech stuff. It could be interesting to test some cross-chain transaction though, and the full integration with Bitcoin chain might keep the media on Ltc for a while, and the price could hold. Moreover, if btc fees won’t decrease, and it could be the case if the development of LN clients is too slow, or the second part of SegWit2x fails (or leads to a severe chain split), Litecoin could see a new light.

  2. Singh ha detto:

    This frenzy of bitcoin and blockchain is exaggerated and turned into a global casino for the participants. For now that is all . There is not even one practical application of blockchain at work solving or enhancing enterprise applications. And the reason for this is the fact that blockchain is encumber some , slow, utilizing extensive amount of computation and energy to validate block of transactions.
    Although the concept of getting rid of centralized trusted parties is the key attribute of blockchain technology, the implementation and speed of process is not yet up to par with the needs and demands that are currently solved by centralized trusted parties.
    Bitcoin thus is only serving as a token of participating in the Ponzi game of global casino it has created. Every newcomer joins in hoping to sell bitcoin to the next guy for a higher price fueling the demand till it implodes and all the late comers hold the bags.
    Very unhealthy for masses . And it will not serve or solve any of the promises that have been hyped as a blockchain.
    There are already others that are at work trying to improve or offer alternative to blockchain in the hope of a practical enterprise application that can immediately be put to work to achieve decentralized transactions through consensus theory. One such model is Hashgraph. Problem with Hashgraph though being licensed to one company as a closed source. Hopefully soon it will be an open source or others will come up with similar improved technology making blockchain obsolete.
    Hashgraph is capable of 250000 transactions per sec, vs. blockchain of 7 transactions per second. Further it is cheaper and will not consume the massive energy blockchain requires.

    • Alberto De Luigi ha detto:

      What you say is mostly true. Blockchain technology doesn’t work without a second layer. But if the second layer works properly, and it’s a both technical and social matter, then it will scale and the problem is solved. We hope the solution is Lightning Network (see the dedicated section on this website, it’s written in english). You speak about the greater fool theory: one buys just because the next one will pay a higher price, but no utility is given, no real need satisfied. Actually, it’s partially true, but not completely. First, because also a digital asset characterized by very expensive transactions can still be helpful in avoiding mass control, wealth redistribution, State coercion, the cost of inflation, price distortion etc. which are socio-political issues. And second, because actually when we buy Bitcoin, Eth or LTC we don’t buy something really valuable now, we buy the promise in what will be in the future, IF in the end it will scale.
      That said, i do not deny that I started to pay the premium for my “insurance” against a complete fail of blockchain technologies: I bought some IOTA. Hashgraph, Direct acyclic graph (DAG), the Tangle technology might be the future.

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *